berdigi.blogg.se

Thanos superhero creator 2.0
Thanos superhero creator 2.0





thanos superhero creator 2.0

It's just that the "alternate" interpretation is that she was totally justified in taking a lovers spat and turning it into a point where she was willing to become a demon and mother of demons/baby killing monster. Which is also where the deliberate "alternate" interpretation comes from. The pop culture Lilith comes from the Alphabet of ben Sirach not the bible where she did in fact have a "proper characterization" and where the idea of her being the wife of Adam, the mother of demons and the murderer of babies comes from. Without even really cutting out that whole mother of demons + baby killing monster part and just excusing it because "well she's on "our" side." However the version that was embraced and turned into a "rebel feminist" was the one that was "Adam's first wife" that went and became the mother of demons and a baby killing monster. There is no biblical Lilith as Adam's first wife that would go on to become the mother of demons/baby killing monster. The ancient "Lilith" may indeed have actually been a species of winged female demon rather than a singular demon named Lilith. Which depending on the translated bible version used isn't even a one off mention as Lilith is replaced with screech owl IIRC. But before any of that, yeah folks still were all UWU over a mass murdering asshole that had taken zero steps to do any good at all.īecause the version of Lilith used as the one that is turned into the feminist rebel icon isn't the one off mention in the bible with no details.

THANOS SUPERHERO CREATOR 2.0 SERIES

Look at how damn many women/LGBT folks wanted to redeem and cuddle Loki even while he was in the midst of being a mass murdering asshole with a god complex.Īt least the Loki series is addressing the fact he's a mass murdering asshole and is trying to make him work to realize the why and to fix it. To use another contemporary pop culture example: So yeah.never underestimate people's ability to uwu a horrible monster if they vaguely align with that persons identity or worldview. Like I brought that up in another thread and someone literally responded "Ok she's a baby eating monster but she's our baby eating monster."

thanos superhero creator 2.0

Then you'll notice she's actually a heroic character often done via rebellion against "the order" she was originally supporting.

thanos superhero creator 2.0

Then you'll start to see she's really just under a lot of pressure/misunderstood She's first going to appear as a queen jerkass that is antagonistic to the protagonists It's to the point now where 2/3 times if you see a character named Lilith in a story you know how her arc is going to play out I mean hell pop culture example "Lilith" being seen as some feminist icon.when in her OG appearance she was the mother of demons and a baby murdering demon herself and it was all out of what amounts to a lovers spat and not wanting to be moderated. Or if they want to fuck that person or both. Remember good chunks of people will say someone is "heroic" if they have some things in common with that person.







Thanos superhero creator 2.0